Screener
RISN vs BIBL
Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF vs Inspire 100 ETF
Key differences
- BIBL costs 0.37% less per year.
- BIBL is significantly larger than RISN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RISN is classified as mixed asset, while BIBL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- RISN follows a active selection strategy; BIBL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BIBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RISN | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $85M | $436M |
| Since | 2020 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.06% | 1.00% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.9% | +38.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.7% | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.64 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.03% | 15.38% |
| Max drawdown | -21.88% | -36.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RISN and BIBL
Explore further