Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RISN vs RHRX

Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF vs RH Tactical Rotation ETF

RISN

Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

Inspire

Annual cost

0.72%

Fund size

$85M

RHRX

RH Tactical Rotation ETF

Adaptive ETF

Annual cost

1.38%

Fund size

$34M

Key differences

  • RISN costs 0.66% less per year.
  • RISN is classified as mixed asset, while RHRX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • RISN follows a active selection strategy; RHRX uses option income.
  • Over the last 3 years, RHRX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RISNRHRX
Annual cost (TER)0.72%1.38%
Fund size (AUM)$85M$34M
Since20202012
Dividend yield1.06%0.00%
Asset classmixed assetalternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1Y+14.9%+39.5%
CAGR 3Y+11.5%+22.4%
CAGR 5Y+4.7%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.641.09
Volatility 1Y12.03%13.26%
Max drawdown-21.88%-25.33%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to RISN and RHRX