Screener
RNEM vs EMOP
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF vs AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- EMOP costs 0.06% less per year.
- EMOP is significantly larger than RNEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RNEM follows a index tracking strategy; EMOP uses active selection.
- EMOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RNEM | EMOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.76% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2017 | 1995 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 1.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.35% | — |
| Max drawdown | -38.37% | -12.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RNEM and EMOP
Explore further