Screener
RNRG vs PFFV
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF vs Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PFFV costs 0.40% less per year.
- PFFV is significantly larger than RNRG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RNRG is classified as equity, while PFFV is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- RNRG covers global markets; PFFV covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, PFFV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RNRG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RNRG | PFFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $302M |
| Since | 2015 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 8.13% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.6% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +8.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | +2.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.10 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.67% | 4.20% |
| Max drawdown | -58.79% | -18.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RNRG and PFFV
Explore further