Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RNRG vs SMOG

Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF vs VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF

RNRG

Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$31M

SMOG

VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.64%

Fund size

$152M

Key differences

  • SMOG is significantly larger than RNRG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SMOG has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • SMOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RNRGSMOG
Annual cost (TER)0.65%0.64%
Fund size (AUM)$31M$152M
Since20152007
Dividend yield1.29%1.31%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobalglobal
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+42.6%+43.1%
CAGR 3Y+3.7%+11.7%
CAGR 5Y-2.4%+3.0%
Sharpe 3Y0.100.45
Volatility 1Y15.67%20.30%
Max drawdown-58.79%-51.11%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to RNRG and SMOG