Screener
RNRG vs ZAP
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF vs Global X U.S. Electrification ETF
Key differences
- ZAP costs 0.15% less per year.
- ZAP is significantly larger than RNRG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RNRG covers global markets; ZAP covers north america.
- RNRG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RNRG | ZAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $456M |
| Since | 2015 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.9% | +35.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.69% | 14.77% |
| Max drawdown | -58.79% | -12.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RNRG and ZAP
Explore further