Screener
ZAP vs ICLN
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.11% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than ZAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ZAP covers north america markets; ICLN covers global.
- ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZAP | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $456M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2024 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 1.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.0% | +78.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.77% | 25.99% |
| Max drawdown | -12.38% | -66.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ZAP and ICLN
Explore further