Screener
ROAM vs FSMD
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF vs Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- FSMD costs 0.29% less per year.
- FSMD is significantly larger than ROAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROAM covers emerging markets markets; FSMD covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, ROAM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROAM | FSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $106M | $2.4B |
| Since | 2015 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 2.74% | 1.25% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.2% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.5% | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +9.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.33 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.41% | 15.36% |
| Max drawdown | -45.46% | -40.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROAM and FSMD
Explore further