Screener
ROAM vs FLRG
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF vs Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- FLRG costs 0.29% less per year.
- ROAM covers emerging markets markets; FLRG covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, ROAM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROAM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROAM | FLRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $106M | $283M |
| Since | 2015 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 2.74% | 1.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.2% | +19.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.5% | +19.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.33 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.41% | 10.28% |
| Max drawdown | -45.46% | -19.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROAM and FLRG
Explore further