Screener
ROAM vs OSEA
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF vs Harbor International Compounders ETF
Key differences
- ROAM costs 0.11% less per year.
- OSEA is significantly larger than ROAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROAM covers emerging markets markets; OSEA covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, ROAM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROAM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROAM | OSEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $106M | $497M |
| Since | 2015 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.74% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +50.8% | +8.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.2% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.42 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.76% | 15.20% |
| Max drawdown | -45.46% | -18.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROAM and OSEA
Explore further