Screener
ROAM vs EMGF
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF vs iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- EMGF costs 0.18% less per year.
- EMGF is significantly larger than ROAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROAM follows a index tracking strategy; EMGF uses index enhanced.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROAM | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $106M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.74% | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.2% | +46.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.5% | +24.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.33 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.41% | 19.44% |
| Max drawdown | -45.46% | -40.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROAM and EMGF
Explore further