Screener
RODM vs FLRG
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF vs Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- FLRG costs 0.14% less per year.
- RODM is significantly larger than FLRG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RODM covers global markets; FLRG covers north america.
- RODM follows a index enhanced strategy; FLRG uses index tracking.
- RODM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RODM | FLRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $283M |
| Since | 2015 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 2.81% | 1.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | +19.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +19.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.29 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.77% | 10.28% |
| Max drawdown | -35.98% | -19.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RODM and FLRG
Explore further