Screener
RODM vs ROAM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- RODM costs 0.15% less per year.
- RODM is significantly larger than ROAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RODM covers global markets; ROAM covers emerging markets.
- RODM follows a index enhanced strategy; ROAM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ROAM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RODM | ROAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $106M |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.81% | 2.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | +45.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.29 | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.77% | 14.41% |
| Max drawdown | -35.98% | -45.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RODM and ROAM
Explore further