Screener
ROE vs IQLT
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF vs iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
Key differences
- IQLT costs 0.19% less per year.
- IQLT is significantly larger than ROE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROE covers north america markets; IQLT covers global ex us.
- ROE follows a active selection strategy; IQLT uses index tracking.
- IQLT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROE | IQLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $239M | $12.9B |
| Since | 2023 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.01% | 2.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.5% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | 14.48% |
| Max drawdown | -19.10% | -32.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROE and IQLT
Explore further