Screener
ROE vs MANI
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF vs Man Active Income ETF
Key differences
- ROE is classified as equity, while MANI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ROE covers north america markets; MANI covers emerging markets.
- ROE follows a active selection strategy; MANI uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROE | MANI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $239M | — |
| Since | 2023 | — |
| Dividend yield | 1.01% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.02% | — |
| Max drawdown | -19.10% | -0.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROE and MANI
Explore further