Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ROE vs MHY

Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF vs Man Active High Yield ETF

ROE

Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF

Astoria Portfolio Advisors LLC

Annual cost

0.49%

Fund size

$239M

MHY

Man Active High Yield ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

Key differences

  • ROE is classified as equity, while MHY is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • ROE covers north america markets; MHY covers emerging markets.
  • ROE follows a active selection strategy; MHY uses long short.

Side-by-side comparison

ROEMHY
Annual cost (TER)0.49%
Fund size (AUM)$239M
Since2023
Dividend yield1.01%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americaemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionlong short
CAGR 1Y+37.5%N/A
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y14.02%
Max drawdown-19.10%-1.59%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to ROE and MHY