Skip to content
Screener

ROM vs REK

ProShares Ultra Technology vs ProShares Short Real Estate

ROM

ProShares Ultra Technology

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$1.4B

REK

ProShares Short Real Estate

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$11M

Key differences

Both ROM and REK are equity ETFs. ROM charges 0.95% a year and REK 0.95%. The main difference: ROM follows a leveraged strategy; REK uses inverse.

  • ROM follows a leveraged strategy; REK uses inverse.
  • ROM is much larger than REK. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, ROM has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

ROMREK
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$1.4B$11M
Since20072010
Dividend yield0.14%3.29%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyleveragedinverse
CAGR 1Y+114.2%-5.9%
CAGR 3Y+54.7%-4.3%
CAGR 5Y+28.0%-0.6%
Sharpe 3Y1.07-0.39
Volatility 1Y45.31%13.79%
Max drawdown-67.55%-58.67%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ROM and REK