Screener
RONB vs LMBS
Baron First Principles ETF vs First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- LMBS costs 0.34% less per year.
- LMBS is significantly larger than RONB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RONB is classified as equity, while LMBS is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- RONB follows a active selection strategy; LMBS uses index tracking.
- LMBS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RONB | LMBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $388M | $6.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.09% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 1.98% |
| Max drawdown | -13.08% | -6.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RONB and LMBS
Explore further