Screener
ROSC vs FLRG
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF vs Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- FLRG costs 0.19% less per year.
- FLRG is significantly larger than ROSC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FLRG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROSC | FLRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $283M |
| Since | 2015 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.87% | 1.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.4% | +19.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.4% | +19.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.75% | 10.28% |
| Max drawdown | -43.13% | -19.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROSC and FLRG
Explore further