Screener
ROSC vs JHML
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF vs John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
Key differences
- JHML costs 0.05% less per year.
- JHML is significantly larger than ROSC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROSC follows a index tracking strategy; JHML uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, JHML has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROSC | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.87% | 0.99% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.4% | +27.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.4% | +20.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +11.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.75% | 11.62% |
| Max drawdown | -43.13% | -36.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROSC and JHML
Explore further