Screener
RPG vs IDHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF vs Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF
Key differences
- IDHQ costs 0.06% less per year.
- RPG covers north america markets; IDHQ covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, RPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RPG | IDHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $741M |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | 2.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.1% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.0% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.62% | 18.42% |
| Max drawdown | -36.58% | -33.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RPG and IDHQ
Explore further