Screener
RPG vs OMFS
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- RPG is significantly larger than OMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RPG follows a index tracking strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, RPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RPG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RPG | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $275M |
| Since | 2006 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.9% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.6% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.1% | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.79% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -36.58% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RPG and OMFS
Explore further