Screener
RPG vs PWB
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF vs Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- RPG costs 0.20% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, PWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RPG | PWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $1.9B |
| Since | 2006 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.1% | +42.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.0% | +33.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | +17.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.62% | 18.41% |
| Max drawdown | -36.58% | -32.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RPG and PWB
Explore further