Screener
RPV vs RSPF
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF
Key differences
- RPV costs 0.05% less per year.
- RPV is significantly larger than RSPF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RPV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RPV | RSPF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $274M |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 2.33% | 1.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.4% | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.6% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.8% | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.76% | 15.10% |
| Max drawdown | -50.67% | -44.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RPV and RSPF
Explore further