Screener
RPV vs RZG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RPV is significantly larger than RZG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| RPV | RZG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $121M |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 2.33% | 0.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.5% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +5.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.77% | 18.58% |
| Max drawdown | -50.67% | -54.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RPV and RZG
Explore further