Screener
RSMV vs FDMO
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
Key differences
- FDMO costs 0.80% less per year.
- FDMO is significantly larger than RSMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSMV follows a active selection strategy; FDMO uses index tracking.
- FDMO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSMV | FDMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $842M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 0.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.84% | 16.48% |
| Max drawdown | -17.58% | -33.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSMV and FDMO
Explore further