Screener
RSMV vs ONEO
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
Key differences
- ONEO costs 0.75% less per year.
- RSMV follows a active selection strategy; ONEO uses index tracking.
- ONEO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSMV | ONEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $27M |
| Since | 2025 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 1.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +25.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.84% | 12.91% |
| Max drawdown | -17.58% | -40.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSMV and ONEO
Explore further