Screener
RSMV vs FIVA
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
Key differences
- FIVA costs 0.77% less per year.
- FIVA is significantly larger than RSMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSMV covers north america markets; FIVA covers global.
- RSMV follows a active selection strategy; FIVA uses index tracking.
- FIVA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSMV | FIVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $533M |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 2.63% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +35.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.84% | 15.23% |
| Max drawdown | -17.58% | -39.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSMV and FIVA
Explore further