Screener
RSMV vs MAVF
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs Matrix Advisors Value ETF
Key differences
- MAVF costs 0.20% less per year.
- MAVF is significantly larger than RSMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSMV | MAVF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $91M |
| Since | 2025 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 0.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +36.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.84% | 14.06% |
| Max drawdown | -17.58% | -14.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSMV and MAVF
Explore further