Screener
RSMV vs ONEV
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
Key differences
- ONEV costs 0.75% less per year.
- ONEV is significantly larger than RSMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSMV is classified as equity, while ONEV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RSMV follows a active selection strategy; ONEV uses multi strategy.
- ONEV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSMV | ONEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $501M |
| Since | 2025 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 1.78% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +12.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.84% | 11.35% |
| Max drawdown | -17.58% | -39.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSMV and ONEV
Explore further