Screener
RSMV vs PWV
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- PWV costs 0.40% less per year.
- PWV is significantly larger than RSMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSMV follows a active selection strategy; PWV uses index tracking.
- PWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSMV | PWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 1.83% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.1% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.92% | 9.41% |
| Max drawdown | -17.58% | -37.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSMV and PWV
Explore further