Screener
RSMV vs SAMT
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- SAMT costs 0.29% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than RSMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSMV is classified as equity, while SAMT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RSMV follows a active selection strategy; SAMT uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSMV | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $619M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.1% | +46.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.92% | 16.65% |
| Max drawdown | -17.58% | -20.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSMV and SAMT
Explore further