Screener
RSPA vs RFV
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- RSPA costs 0.06% less per year.
- RSPA is classified as alternative, while RFV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- RSPA follows a option income strategy; RFV uses index tracking.
- RFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPA | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $748M | $313M |
| Since | 2024 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 9.12% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.7% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.46% | 18.26% |
| Max drawdown | -15.37% | -52.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSPA and RFV
Explore further