Screener
RSPA vs RWL
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- RSPA costs 0.10% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than RSPA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSPA is classified as alternative, while RWL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- RSPA follows a option income strategy; RWL uses index tracking.
- RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPA | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $748M | $8.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 9.12% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.7% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.46% | 10.12% |
| Max drawdown | -15.37% | -36.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSPA and RWL
Explore further