Screener
RSPC vs XLCI
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF vs State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
Key differences
- XLCI costs 0.05% less per year.
- RSPC is significantly larger than XLCI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSPC is classified as equity, while XLCI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RSPC follows a index tracking strategy; XLCI uses option income.
- RSPC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPC | XLCI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $2M |
| Since | 2018 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.70% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.44% | — |
| Max drawdown | -38.19% | -7.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSPC and XLCI
Explore further