Screener
XLCI vs FCOM
State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF vs Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF
Key differences
- FCOM costs 0.27% less per year.
- FCOM is significantly larger than XLCI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XLCI is classified as alternative, while FCOM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- XLCI follows a option income strategy; FCOM uses index tracking.
- FCOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XLCI | FCOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.91% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.32% |
| Max drawdown | -7.72% | -46.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XLCI and FCOM
Explore further