Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RSPE vs RSPF

Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF

RSPE

Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF

Invesco

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$61M

RSPF

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF

Invesco

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$274M

Key differences

  • RSPE costs 0.20% less per year.
  • RSPF is significantly larger than RSPE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, RSPF has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • RSPF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RSPERSPF
Annual cost (TER)0.20%0.40%
Fund size (AUM)$61M$274M
Since20212006
Dividend yield1.55%1.66%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+25.7%+6.4%
CAGR 3Y+16.1%+17.6%
CAGR 5YN/A+5.9%
Sharpe 3Y0.860.84
Volatility 1Y12.81%15.08%
Max drawdown-22.93%-44.80%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to RSPE and RSPF