Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RSPF vs KBWB

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF vs Invesco KBW Bank ETF

RSPF

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$274M

KBWB

Invesco KBW Bank ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$5.5B

Key differences

  • KBWB costs 0.05% less per year.
  • KBWB is significantly larger than RSPF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, KBWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • RSPF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RSPFKBWB
Annual cost (TER)0.40%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$274M$5.5B
Since20062011
Dividend yield1.66%2.06%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+6.3%+37.1%
CAGR 3Y+17.1%+33.6%
CAGR 5Y+6.2%+8.1%
Sharpe 3Y0.811.19
Volatility 1Y15.10%20.09%
Max drawdown-44.80%-50.27%

Similar to RSPF and KBWB