Screener
RSPG vs DUG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF vs ProShares UltraShort Energy ETF
Key differences
- RSPG costs 0.55% less per year.
- RSPG is significantly larger than DUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSPG follows a index tracking strategy; DUG uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, RSPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPG | DUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $624M | $18M |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.89% | 5.09% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.8% | -52.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | -27.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.2% | -39.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | -0.61 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.70% | 40.83% |
| Max drawdown | -73.17% | -99.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSPG and DUG
Explore further