Screener
RSPG vs IXC
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF vs iShares Global Energy ETF
Key differences
- IXC is significantly larger than RSPG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RSPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPG | IXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $624M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2006 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.89% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.8% | +53.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.6% | +19.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.1% | +20.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.47% | 18.44% |
| Max drawdown | -73.17% | -64.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSPG and IXC
Explore further