Screener
RSPG vs PXJ
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF vs Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF
Key differences
- RSPG costs 0.23% less per year.
- RSPG is significantly larger than PXJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPG | PXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.63% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $624M | $137M |
| Since | 2006 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.89% | 2.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.8% | +105.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.6% | +29.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.1% | +20.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.47% | 26.01% |
| Max drawdown | -73.17% | -87.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSPG and PXJ
Explore further