Screener
RSPG vs XOP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
Key differences
- XOP costs 0.05% less per year.
- XOP is significantly larger than RSPG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSPG is classified as equity, while XOP is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, RSPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPG | XOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $624M | $3.6B |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.89% | 1.83% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.8% | +45.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.6% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.1% | +16.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.47% | 27.54% |
| Max drawdown | -73.17% | -82.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSPG and XOP
Explore further