Screener
RSPH vs SPXV
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF vs ProShares S&P 500 ex-Health Care ETF
Key differences
- SPXV costs 0.31% less per year.
- RSPH is significantly larger than SPXV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPXV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RSPH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPH | SPXV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $685M | $38M |
| Since | 2006 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.0% | +32.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.6% | +25.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.5% | +15.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.01 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.48% | 12.80% |
| Max drawdown | -30.44% | -34.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSPH and SPXV
Explore further