Screener
RSPM vs FMAT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF vs Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
Key differences
- FMAT costs 0.32% less per year.
- FMAT is significantly larger than RSPM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FMAT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RSPM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPM | FMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $179M | $603M |
| Since | 2006 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 1.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.6% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.6% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.40 | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.20% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -39.84% | -41.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSPM and FMAT
Explore further