Screener
RSSL vs QTR
Global X Russell 2000 ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
Key differences
- RSSL costs 0.17% less per year.
- RSSL is significantly larger than QTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSSL is classified as equity, while QTR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RSSL follows a index tracking strategy; QTR uses volatility strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSSL | QTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $3M |
| Since | 2024 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.33% | 17.74% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | volatility strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.0% | +34.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.09% | 14.14% |
| Max drawdown | -27.79% | -31.72% |
Similar to RSSL and QTR
Explore further