Screener
RTH vs IWB
VanEck Retail ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
Both RTH and IWB are equity ETFs. RTH charges 0.35% a year and IWB 0.15%. The main difference: IWB costs 0.20% less per year.
- IWB costs 0.20% less per year.
- IWB is much larger than RTH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RTH | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $253M | $48.9B |
| Since | 2011 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.9% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +22.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.5% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.09% | 12.22% |
| Max drawdown | -25.00% | -34.60% |
Similar to RTH and IWB
Explore further