Screener
RTH vs IWM
VanEck Retail ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
Both RTH and IWM are equity ETFs. RTH charges 0.35% a year and IWM 0.19%. The main difference: IWM costs 0.16% less per year.
- IWM costs 0.16% less per year.
- IWM is much larger than RTH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RTH | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $253M | $80.9B |
| Since | 2011 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 0.87% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.9% | +36.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.5% | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.09% | 19.54% |
| Max drawdown | -25.00% | -41.13% |
Similar to RTH and IWM
Explore further