Screener
RTH vs TRUH
VanEck Retail ETF vs Vaneck Healthcare TruSector ETF
Key differences
- TRUH costs 0.25% less per year.
- RTH is significantly larger than TRUH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RTH follows a index tracking strategy; TRUH uses active selection.
- RTH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RTH | TRUH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.10% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $0.5M |
| Since | 2011 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.88% | — |
| Max drawdown | -25.00% | -4.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RTH and TRUH
Explore further