Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RTH vs PPH

VanEck Retail ETF vs VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF

RTH

VanEck Retail ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$265M

PPH

VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.36%

Fund size

$966M

Key differences

  • PPH is significantly larger than RTH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, RTH has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

RTHPPH
Annual cost (TER)0.35%0.36%
Fund size (AUM)$265M$966M
Since20112011
Dividend yield0.90%2.12%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+14.4%+24.2%
CAGR 3Y+17.2%+12.4%
CAGR 5Y+10.1%+9.9%
Sharpe 3Y0.980.61
Volatility 1Y11.88%17.11%
Max drawdown-25.00%-29.70%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to RTH and PPH