Screener
RULE vs BDGS
Adaptive Core ETF vs Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Key differences
- BDGS costs 0.97% less per year.
- BDGS is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RULE is classified as mixed asset, while BDGS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, RULE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RULE | BDGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.84% | 0.87% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $42M |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.53% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.5% | +14.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +14.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.69% | 6.06% |
| Max drawdown | -30.48% | -9.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RULE and BDGS
Explore further